Practical guide
Seedance 2.0 vs Mini: Which Model Should You Use?
Seedance Mini is the lower-cost choice for iteration; Seedance 2.0 is the better fit for approved, higher-fidelity short clips.
Last updated: 2026-07-05
Comparison data
| Decision | Seedance 2.0 | Seedance Mini | Recommended use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansova credits | 1.8/sec | 1.2/sec | Mini for volume |
| Public durations | 5/10/15 sec | 5/10/15 sec | Tie |
| Public resolutions | 480p/720p | 480p/720p | Tie |
| Input | Text or image | Text or image | Tie |
| Creative stage | Final candidate | Draft and test | Split by stage |
Recommendations by scenario
Product ad concept
Start with Mini, then rerun the selected direction in Seedance 2.0.
Architecture camera move
Use Seedance 2.0 when reflections, material detail, and light transitions matter.
Daily social content
Use Mini to preserve credits across repeated short-form output.
Concrete examples
- 01Product reveal: A brushed aluminum speaker rotates slowly on a dark plinth, controlled rim light, minimal camera arc.
- 02Architecture: Slow dolly toward a concrete courtyard house at dusk, warm interior light and moving tree shadows.
- 03Social: A folded paper package opens into a geometric flower, fixed camera, clean vertical composition.
Limitations and pitfalls
- Neither model guarantees exact packaging text or logos.
- Complex multi-shot prompts can reduce continuity.
- Queue time and output options depend on provider availability.
Continue in Kansova
Sources and methodology
This guide uses the supplied provider documentation, current Kansova controls, and published Kansova credit rules. It avoids quality rankings that were not measured in a controlled test.
- EvoLink documentationProvider capability and parameter reference.
- Kansova factsCurrent product capabilities and limitations.
- Kansova pricingCurrent plans and credit allowances.