compare guide
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Mini
Compare Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Mini by cost, speed, supported inputs, output options, and best use cases.
TL;DR
Choose Mini for iteration and Seedance 2.0 for higher-fidelity final clips.
Who this is for
- Creators deciding which model to use before spending credits.
- Marketing teams separating draft generation from final production.
- Architects comparing low-cost motion tests with polished camera moves.
Best for / Not best for
Best for
- Model selection
- Credit planning
- Draft-versus-final workflows
- Comparing video use cases
Not best for
- Comparing long-form editors
- Audio post-production
- Frame-level benchmark claims
- Models not currently public in Kansova
Parameters
| Parameter | Supported value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 5, 10, or 15 seconds | Selected before generation. |
| Resolution | 480p or 720p | Availability may vary with provider load. |
| Input | Text or reference image | Reference image is required for image-to-video. |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 9:16, or 1:1 | Choose for the target channel. |
| Processing | Asynchronous | Kansova polls task status until completion. |
Pricing
Kansova bills generations in credits. Pro is $19/month for 500 credits; Studio is $39/month for 1,100 credits.
| Generation | Kansova credits | Cost methodology |
|---|---|---|
| 5-second clip | 9 credits | About $0.23 provider cost |
| 10-second clip | 18 credits | About $0.45 provider cost |
| 15-second clip | 27 credits | About $0.68 provider cost |
Comparison
| Dimension | Seedance 2.0 | Seedance Mini | Kling Turbo | Runway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary strength | Finished creative | Fast iteration | Dynamic motion | Creative control |
| Kansova access | Available | Available | Not currently public | Not currently public |
| Input modes | Text, image | Text, image | Varies | Varies |
| Kansova cost | 1.8 credits/sec | 1.2 credits/sec | Not priced | Not priced |
| Best workflow | Campaign output | Drafts and social | Action shots | Advanced editing |
Prompt examples
- 01
A glass skincare bottle rises through clear blue water, slow push-in, suspended droplets, premium studio highlights, 9:16. - 02
Slow forward movement toward a modern concrete villa at blue hour, warm interior lights reflected in the pool. - 03
A white sneaker rotates on a matte plinth, soft directional light moves across the material, clean ecommerce campaign. - 04
Macro shot of a watch mechanism starting to move, shallow depth of field, restrained luxury advertising style. - 05
A folded paper sculpture opens into a geometric flower, fixed camera, soft shadows, minimal design film.
Known limitations
- Higher fidelity costs more credits than Seedance 2.0 Mini.
- Fine typography and small brand marks still require post-generation review.
- Complex prompts with several cuts can produce inconsistent transitions.
- Queue time and output options depend on upstream provider availability.
Alternatives
Frequently asked questions
How many credits does Seedance 2.0 use?
Kansova currently charges 1.8 credits per requested second, rounded up.
When should I use Seedance 2 instead of Mini?
Use Seedance 2 for approved concepts where visual fidelity matters more than draft speed.
Does it support image-to-video?
Yes. Kansova supports a reference-image workflow when the provider mode is available.
Last updated
2026-07-05
Sources and methodology
Parameters were checked against the provider API material supplied to Kansova and the live Kansova controls on 2026-07-05. Reference API costs are planning figures from the supplied provider catalog, not a separate charge billed by Kansova.
- EvoLink API documentation index
Provider documentation used to verify Seedance modes and parameters.
- Kansova product facts
Canonical list of supported workflows and current limitations.
- Kansova pricing
Current subscription and monthly credit allowances.