compare guide
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Mini
Compare Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Mini by cost, speed, supported inputs, output options, and best use cases.
TL;DR
Choose Mini for iteration and Seedance 2.0 for higher-fidelity final clips.
Who this is for
- Creators deciding which model to use before spending credits.
- Marketing teams separating draft generation from final production.
- Architects comparing low-cost motion tests with polished camera moves.
Best for / Not best for
Best for
- Model selection
- Credit planning
- Draft-versus-final workflows
- Comparing video use cases
Not best for
- Comparing long-form editors
- Audio post-production
- Frame-level benchmark claims
- Models not currently public in Kansova
Parameters
| Parameter | Supported value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 5, 10, or 15 seconds | Selected before generation. |
| Resolution | 480p or 720p | Availability may vary with provider load. |
| Input | Text or reference image | Reference image is required for image-to-video. |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 9:16, or 1:1 | Choose for the target channel. |
| Processing | Asynchronous | Kansova polls task status until completion. |
Pricing
Kansova bills generations in credits. Pro is $19/month for 750 credits; Studio is $39/month for 1,700 credits.
| Generation | Kansova credits | Cost methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Seedance Mini, 5 seconds | 15 credits (480p) / 25 credits (720p) | About $0.14-$0.28 provider cost |
| Seedance 2.0, 5 seconds | 25 credits (480p) / 50 credits (720p) | About $0.28-$0.58 provider cost |
| Longer duration | Charged per requested second | Shown before generation |
Comparison
| Dimension | Seedance 2.0 | Seedance Mini | Kling Turbo | Runway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary strength | Finished creative | Fast iteration | Dynamic motion | Creative control |
| Kansova access | Available | Available | Not currently public | Not currently public |
| Input modes | Text, image | Text, image | Varies | Varies |
| Kansova cost | 5-10 credits/sec | 3-5 credits/sec | Not priced | Not priced |
| Best workflow | Campaign output | Drafts and social | Action shots | Advanced editing |
Prompt examples
- 01
A glass skincare bottle rises through clear blue water, slow push-in, suspended droplets, premium studio highlights, 9:16. - 02
Slow forward movement toward a modern concrete villa at blue hour, warm interior lights reflected in the pool. - 03
A white sneaker rotates on a matte plinth, soft directional light moves across the material, clean ecommerce campaign. - 04
Macro shot of a watch mechanism starting to move, shallow depth of field, restrained luxury advertising style. - 05
A folded paper sculpture opens into a geometric flower, fixed camera, soft shadows, minimal design film.
Known limitations
- Higher fidelity costs more credits than Seedance 2.0 Mini.
- Fine typography and small brand marks still require post-generation review.
- Complex prompts with several cuts can produce inconsistent transitions.
- Queue time and output options depend on upstream provider availability.
Alternatives
Frequently asked questions
How many credits does Seedance 2.0 use?
Kansova currently charges 5 credits per requested second at 480p and 10 credits per second at 720p.
When should I use Seedance 2 instead of Mini?
Use Seedance 2 for approved concepts where visual fidelity matters more than draft speed.
Does it support image-to-video?
Yes. Kansova supports a reference-image workflow when the provider mode is available.
Last updated
2026-08-05
Sources and methodology
Parameters were checked against the provider API material supplied to Kansova and the live Kansova controls on 2026-07-06. Reference API costs are planning figures from the supplied provider catalog, not a separate charge billed by Kansova.
- EvoLink API documentation index
Provider documentation used to verify Seedance modes and parameters.
- Kansova product facts
Canonical list of supported workflows and current limitations.
- Kansova pricing
Current subscription and monthly credit allowances.